Author: Ayush Gaurav
"Religious freedom is not just a fundamental right, it is a key ingredient in building a pluralistic and inclusive society. It is only when we respect and embrace our differences that we can build a truly united and prosperous India." - Shashi Tharoor, Indian politician and former UN Under-Secretary-General.
Introduction
India is known for its religious diversity, with Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, and many other faiths coexisting in the same society. However, this diversity has also led to tensions and conflicts between different religious communities, resulting in instances of violence, discrimination, and communal polarization. The issue of religious freedom and communal tensions has become one of the most pressing socio-legal challenges facing India today, with the potential to undermine social harmony and economic development. In this blog, we will explore the various aspects of this complex issue, including the legal framework for religious freedom in India, the history and causes of communal tensions, the role of the state in protecting religious minorities, and the efforts of civil society organizations and interfaith groups to promote interfaith dialogue and cooperation. We will also examine the impact of communal tensions on economic development and the prospects for promoting religious freedom and communal harmony in India.
The legal framework for religious freedom in India
In India, the legal framework for religious freedom is primarily governed by the Indian Constitution, which enshrines the right to freedom of religion as a fundamental right. Specifically, Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees that all persons have the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, subject only to reasonable restrictions that may be imposed by the State in the interest of public order, morality, or health.
In addition to the Constitution, there are several laws and regulations that provide legal protection for religious freedom in India. These include the Right to Freedom of Religion Act, which prohibits forced religious conversions and provides for punishment for those who engage in such activities, and the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, which seeks to maintain the religious character of certain places of worship and prevent their conversion from one religion to another. Furthermore, the Indian judiciary has played a crucial role in upholding religious freedom in the country through various landmark judgments. For instance, in the S.R. Bommai v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court of India held that secularism was a basic feature of the Indian Constitution and that the state must maintain equidistance from all religions. In the Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar case, the Court emphasized that religious practices that cause harm to animals or violate the rights of others cannot be protected under the right to freedom of religion.
The legal framework for religious freedom in India is robust and provides for a wide range of protections for individuals and communities of all faiths. However, there are also challenges and limitations in the implementation of these laws and regulations, particularly in cases of communal tension and violence, where the state's response has been criticized for being inadequate or biased.
Problem of Communal tensions in India
Communal tensions in India refer to the social and political conflicts that arise between different religious communities, often resulting in violence, discrimination, and polarization. These tensions can pose a significant challenge to the rule of law and undermine social cohesion and economic development.
The problem of communal tensions in India is multifaceted and can arise from various factors, including religious differences, caste divisions, economic disparities, political ideologies, and historical grievances. The phenomenon of social media and fake news has also been known to exacerbate communal tensions by spreading rumors and inciting violence. Communal tensions in India are also a legal problem, as they can lead to the violation of the fundamental right to life and personal liberty, as well as the right to freedom of religion enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The state has a duty to protect these rights and prevent communal violence, but this has often been challenging, given the complex nature of the issue and the political pressures involved.
The legal response to communal tensions in India includes a range of measures, including preventive actions such as imposing curfews and prohibitory orders, investigating incidents of violence, and prosecuting those responsible for crimes. Additionally, there are legal provisions that seek to promote interfaith dialogue and cooperation, such as the National Integration Council and the Sachar Committee, which have made recommendations for promoting communal harmony and social justice. Despite these measures, communal tensions remain a significant challenge in India, and there is a need for continued efforts to address the root causes of the problem, including through education, economic development, and the promotion of social harmony and understanding across different religious communities.
Freedom of religion and minorities in India are two different aspects
Freedom of religion and the protection of minorities are two critical aspects of the legal framework for religious freedom in India. The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of religion to all individuals, including religious minorities, and provides for various legal protections to safeguard this right.
Under the Indian Constitution, religious minorities are entitled to a range of protections, including the right to establish and manage their own religious institutions, the right to maintain and propagate their religion, and the right to receive protection from discrimination and violence. The Constitution also provides for affirmative action measures to promote the educational and economic development of minority communities.
Additionally, there are several laws and regulations that provide legal protection to religious minorities in India. For example, the Protection of Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on religion, caste, or race, while the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act provides for the prevention of atrocities against members of these communities. The Indian judiciary has also played a significant role in protecting the rights of religious minorities in the country. For example, in the T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka case, the Supreme Court of India upheld the right of minority institutions to manage their own affairs, while in the Delhi High Court's Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi case, the court struck down the criminalization of homosexual activity, which was seen as discriminatory against sexual minorities.
However, despite these legal protections, religious minorities in India continue to face various challenges, including instances of violence, discrimination, and marginalization. These issues are often exacerbated by communal tensions and the politicization of religion, which can make it difficult for the state to enforce the law and protect the rights of minorities effectively. Overall, the protection of religious freedom and minorities is a critical legal issue in India, and there is a need for continued efforts to promote social harmony and interfaith dialogue, strengthen the legal framework for protecting the rights of minorities, and address the underlying causes of communal tensions and discrimination.
The role of the state in protecting religious freedom
The protection of religious freedom is a critical obligation of the state in India, as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The Constitution recognizes the right to freedom of religion as a fundamental right and mandates that the state take measures to safeguard this right for all individuals and communities in the country.
The state has a crucial role in protecting religious freedom in India, and it is responsible for creating a legal framework that guarantees this right and ensures that it is enforced. The state's role includes the following:
Ensuring the legal framework for religious freedom: The state is responsible for creating a legal framework that guarantees religious freedom to all individuals and communities in India. This includes enacting laws and regulations that protect religious freedom, such as the Indian Constitution, the Protection of Civil Rights Act, and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, among others.
Preventing discrimination and violence: The state has a duty to prevent discrimination and violence based on religion and to prosecute those responsible for such acts. The state must also take measures to provide security to individuals and communities who are at risk of violence or discrimination based on their religious identity.
Promoting interfaith dialogue and understanding: The state has a role in promoting interfaith dialogue and understanding to prevent communal tensions and promote social harmony. The state can do this through various measures, including educational programs, cultural events, and public awareness campaigns.
Ensuring minority rights: The state is responsible for ensuring that the rights of religious minorities are protected, including their right to establish and manage their own religious institutions, to maintain and propagate their religion, and to receive protection from discrimination and violence.
Supporting affirmative action measures: The state has a duty to support affirmative action measures to promote the educational and economic development of minority communities.
In conclusion, the state has a critical role in protecting religious freedom in India, and it must take steps to ensure that the legal framework for religious freedom is enforced effectively. The state must also work to prevent discrimination and violence, promote interfaith dialogue and understanding, and support affirmative action measures to promote the development of minority communities.
Relationship between Religion and politics in India
The relationship between religion and politics in India is a complex issue that has been the subject of significant legal, social, and political debate. While the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of religion and the separation of religion and politics, religion has often played a significant role in Indian politics. Under the Indian Constitution, political parties cannot be formed on religious lines, and political activities that promote religious hatred or violence are strictly prohibited. However, despite these legal provisions, religion has often been used as a tool to mobilize voters and gain political support. This has led to the politicization of religion and the emergence of communal tensions, which pose a significant challenge to India's social and political fabric.
Several legal cases have dealt with the issue of religion and politics in India. In the S.R. Bommai v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court of India held that secularism is an essential feature of the Indian Constitution and that any attempt to overthrow a democratically elected government on the grounds of religion is unconstitutional. Similarly, in the Manohar Joshi v. Nitin Bhaurao Patil case, the court held that the use of religious symbols and slogans in election campaigns is not permissible under the Constitution. The Indian judiciary has also played a crucial role in upholding the principle of secularism and preventing the use of religion for political gain. In the Keshavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court of India held that secularism is a basic feature of the Indian Constitution that cannot be amended, and in the Hindutva Cases, the court clarified that Hinduism is a way of life and not a religion for political purposes.
Despite these legal protections, the politicization of religion in India continues to be a significant challenge. Political parties often use religious symbols, slogans, and rhetoric to gain support, which can lead to communal tensions and violence. This highlights the need for continued efforts to promote the separation of religion and politics and to strengthen the legal framework for preventing the use of religion for political gain. While the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of religion and the separation of religion and politics, religion has often been used for political gain in India. The judiciary has played a crucial role in upholding the principle of secularism and preventing the use of religion for political purposes. However, continued efforts are needed to promote the separation of religion and politics and to address the underlying causes of communal tensions in India.
International perspectives on religious freedom in India
The issue of religious freedom in India has attracted significant attention and concern from the international community, particularly in recent years. Several international instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, recognize the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion as a fundamental human right that must be protected by all states. While India has ratified these international instruments, there have been concerns regarding the implementation of these provisions in the country, particularly with regard to the treatment of religious minorities. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, for example, has repeatedly identified India as a country of concern for religious freedom violations, citing incidents of communal violence, discrimination, and restrictions on religious freedom.
The international community has also been critical of the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act, which provides a path to citizenship for non-Muslim refugees from neighboring countries but has been criticized as discriminatory against Muslims. Similarly, the revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 and the enactment of new laws that restrict the right to freedom of expression and assembly have raised concerns among international human rights organizations. Several international bodies and organizations, including the United Nations Human Rights Council and the European Union, have called on the Indian government to address these concerns and take steps to protect the rights of religious minorities. The international community has also emphasized the need for interfaith dialogue, social harmony, and the promotion of diversity and tolerance as essential for protecting religious freedom in India.
Henceforth, the issue of religious freedom in India has attracted significant attention and concern from the international community. While India has ratified international instruments that recognize the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, concerns have been raised regarding the treatment of religious minorities and the implementation of these provisions. The international community has called on the Indian government to take steps to protect the rights of religious minorities and promote interfaith dialogue and social harmony.
Media coverage of communal tensions in India
The media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion and informing the public about communal tensions in India. The Indian Constitution guarantees the freedom of the press and the right to freedom of expression, which includes the freedom to report on events and issues of public interest. However, the media's coverage of communal tensions in India has often been criticized for perpetuating stereotypes and exacerbating tensions.One of the main criticisms of media coverage of communal tensions in India is the tendency to sensationalize events and focus on incidents of violence. This can lead to the demonization of certain communities and the promotion of a divisive and polarizing narrative. The media has also been criticized for its use of inflammatory language and for failing to provide context and nuance to complex issues.
Another concern is the potential for media bias and the influence of political and corporate interests on media coverage. Media outlets with affiliations to certain political parties or religious groups may be more likely to promote a particular agenda or to downplay incidents of violence that are committed by their own community.The media has also been criticized for its coverage of hate speech and incitement to violence. While the media has a responsibility to report on incidents of hate speech and incitement to violence, there are concerns that some media outlets may use such language themselves or provide a platform for those who do.
The Indian judiciary has recognized the important role of the media in shaping public opinion and has emphasized the need for responsible and balanced reporting. The Supreme Court of India has held that the media has a responsibility to report objectively and without bias, and that it should avoid sensationalizing events or using language that may inflame tensions. The media's coverage of communal tensions in India has been the subject of significant criticism and concern. While the media has a responsibility to report on events and issues of public interest, there is a need for responsible and balanced reporting that avoids sensationalism, promotes nuance and context, and avoids the perpetuation of stereotypes. The judiciary has recognized the important role of the media in shaping public opinion and has emphasized the need for responsible reporting.
The impact of communal tensions on economic development in India
Communal tensions can have a significant impact on economic development in India. The Indian economy is diverse and complex, with multiple sectors and industries contributing to its growth. However, communal tensions can disrupt economic activity, damage infrastructure, and create a climate of fear and uncertainty that can discourage investment and growth. One of the most significant impacts of communal tensions on economic development is the disruption of supply chains and the movement of goods and people. Communal violence can lead to road blockades, curfews, and other restrictions that can disrupt the movement of goods and people, leading to shortages of essential goods and services and causing significant economic losses. This can have a particularly significant impact on rural areas, where access to markets and transportation is often limited.
Communal tensions can also have a significant impact on investment and business activity. The uncertainty and instability created by communal tensions can discourage investors from committing capital, leading to a slowdown in economic growth. The perception of insecurity can also lead to a decline in tourism and other forms of economic activity that are dependent on a peaceful and stable environment.
In addition, communal tensions can have a long-term impact on social and economic development. The creation of deep-rooted divisions and the breakdown of trust between communities can make it difficult to promote social cohesion and cooperation, which are essential for economic growth and development. This can lead to a cycle of poverty and underdevelopment, with marginalized communities facing significant barriers to economic participation and development. Communal tensions can have a significant impact on economic development in India. They can disrupt supply chains, discourage investment, and create a climate of fear and uncertainty that can discourage economic activity. In addition, communal tensions can have long-term impacts on social and economic development, making it difficult to promote social cohesion and cooperation, which are essential for economic growth and development.
Future prospects for religious freedom in India in legal language
Religious freedom in India has been the subject of significant debate and discussion, with ongoing tensions and conflicts between different religious communities. Despite these challenges, there are several prospects for the future of religious freedom in India.
One potential area of progress is the development of legal frameworks and institutions that promote religious freedom and protect minority rights. The Indian Constitution guarantees the freedom of religion and the right to practice and propagate religion, and the judiciary has played an important role in interpreting and enforcing these rights. In addition, the creation of specialized institutions such as the National Commission for Minorities and the National Human Rights Commission can provide an important avenue for the protection of minority rights and the promotion of religious freedom.Another potential area of progress is the role of civil society and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in promoting religious freedom and interfaith dialogue. A growing number of civil society organizations and NGOs in India are working to promote tolerance and understanding between different religious communities, and to address the root causes of communal tensions. These efforts can play an important role in promoting religious freedom and building a more inclusive and pluralistic society.
Technology and social media can also play a role in promoting religious freedom in India. The increasing use of technology and social media can create new avenues for dialogue and exchange between different communities, and can help to break down stereotypes and promote understanding. Social media platforms can be used to promote interfaith dialogue and to share information and perspectives from different communities, helping to build bridges and promote mutual respect and understanding.However, there are also several challenges that could impact the future of religious freedom in India. Ongoing communal tensions, the rise of religious nationalism, and the influence of political and economic interests on the media can all create significant barriers to progress. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated economic and social disruptions have created new challenges and uncertainties that could impact the future of religious freedom and minority rights in India.
In conclusion, the future of religious freedom in India is uncertain, but there are several prospects for progress. The development of legal frameworks and institutions, the role of civil society and NGOs, and the potential of technology and social media can all play a role in promoting religious freedom and interfaith dialogue in India. However, ongoing challenges and uncertainties will require ongoing efforts to protect minority rights and promote tolerance and understanding between different religious communities.
Referances
1. Anderson, Perry. 2015. The Indian Ideology. Gurgaon: Three Essays Collective. [Google Scholar]
2. Bauman, Chad M. 2020. Anti-Christian Violence in India. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
3. Bauman, Chad M. 2021. Litigating the Limits of Religion: Minority and Majority Concerns about Institutional Religious Liberty in India. Religions 12: 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Bauman, Chad M., and Tamara Leech. 2012. Political Competition, Relative Deprivation, and Perceived Threat: A Research Note on Anti-Christian Violence in India. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35: 2195–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
5. Bauman, Chad M., and James Ponniah. 2016. Christianity and Freedom in India. In Christianity and Freedom, Volume 2: Contemporary Perspectives. Edited by Timothy Shah and Allen Hertzke. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
6. Berti, Daniela, Gilles Tarabout, and Raphaël Voix. 2016. Filing Religion: State, Hinduism, and Courts of Law. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
7. Burke, Edmund. 1987. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Indianapolis: Hackett. [Google Scholar]
8. Dhavan, Rajeev Dhavan. 1987. Religious Freedom in India. The American Journal of Comparative Law: A Quarterly 35: 209–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Dhavan, Rajeev. 2002. The Road to Xanadu: India’s Quest for Secularism. In Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Edited by Gerald J. Larson. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar]