top of page
  • Writer's pictureBrain Booster Articles

GLIMPSE OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)

Author: Devesh Agarwal, III year of B.A.,LL.B. from Apex University Jaipur

Co-author: Mansi Sharma, V year of B.A.,LL.B. from Geeta Institute of law affiliated to Kurushetra University


Alternate dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a procedure of resolving or settling dispute without visiting the court with the help of an unprejudiced third party. It saves a long time and plutocrat because it's a lower quantum. It enables individualities and groups to bear care of cooperation and social order and is available with creative ideas for resolving the problem that the court might not fairly do. It enables individualities and groups to take care of cooperation and social order. To pander to the true pendency of cases in courts in India, Alternate dispute Resolution plays a big part, thanks to its different ways. Acts which feed to Alternate dispute Resolution are Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and thus the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. In recent times ADR has come the foremost growing field worldwide. Alternate dispute resolution (ADR) proceedings are more flexible and comfy. Arbitration and conciliation acts are Alternate dispute resolution for managing with the civil nature cases.


Meaning of Arbitration

  • An individual named as “arbitrator” hears the arguments and substantiation from both the sides and makes a call (an award) on the dispute. It's less formal.

  • In binding arbitration, Arbitrator’s decision is claimed to be final and there's generally no right to appeal while in non-binding arbitration, parties may raise a trial if unsatisfied with the Arbitrator’s decision. Just in case of Vinod bhaiyalal versus wadhwani parmeshwari cold store house, Supreme court observed that the displeased party had an affordable bias against the Arbitrator and its capability to render independent and unprejudiced award and therefore the award should be set away.

  • As per section 20 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996, the parties are liberated to agree on the place of arbitration, agreed by the parties, to meet at anyplace. It's considered for the discussion among its members, for hearing substantiations, experts or the parties, or for examination of documents, goods or other property. In the case of Brahmani swash bullets limited versus kamachi diligence Limited, supreme court held that the parties had agreed for bhubaneshwar as venue for arbitration proceeding. Therefore, the court had no governance to entertain governance under section 11 (6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.

  • Arbitration is someone with the concurrence of the parties who's competent to pass an award. Like, Judges Retired from state Supreme Court or high court or senior advocate can be Arbitrator as per the concurrence of parties or arbitrator.

  • Occasionally at the time of agreement it's formerly mentioned in agreement who'll be Arbitrator in case controversies arise.


Procedure of arbitration

  • It's mandatory to make a clause in agreement at the time of contract to relate to the dispute in Arbitration. means an agreement by the parties to tolerate arbitration of all or certain controversies which have arisen or which can arise between them in respect of an outlined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.

  • Arbitrator is frequently appointed under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. Arbitrator may be appointed without the court proceedings with the concurrence of the parties and arbitrator but just in case Consent is missing from one party also it will be appointed by the court and parties also are prone to negotiate for the Arbitrator. Like, if a Non-claimant failed to reply to the notice of claimant within 30 days of notice for appointment of Arbitrator also, it will be appointed by the court. Party can choose or suggest the arbitrator or court might also relate any arbitrator from Arbitrator penal as per the case nature. Just in case of Tulsi narayan garg versus theM.P. road development authority, Bhopal, Supreme court held that a party cannot be an arbitrator in his own cause.

  • Arbitrator will be sole or more as per the necessity or clause of arbitration in agreement, it depends upon the dispute like if a dispute arise between two company whose nature of case is different or advice of experts is demanded within the area of the case also there'll be two Arbitrator appointed Like, If Controversies arise just in case of IT company or specialized company also for recognizing the Purity of the case or substantiation another Arbitrator will be needed within the sphere of case.

  • Arbitrator fees are paid by the party inversely but just in case the other party denies or detainments in fees, claimant will be guaranteed to pay the arbitrator fees. Arbitrator fees are named grounded on the disputed quantum. A specific Percentage from disputed quantum will be paid as fees of Arbitrator as per clause of act. Just in case of Icomm tele Ltc versus Punjab state water, supreme court held that a festivity to an arbitration by a pre deposit demand of 10 % would discourage the arbitration process and would be contray to the content ofde-clogging the court system.


Meaning of Conciliation

  • Conciliation means resolving the dispute without action. It's a procedure in which an unprejudiced third party called the “Mediator” assists the parties for the dispute in a mutually agreed agreement of the dispute.

  • Both the parties are duly free to accept or reject the mediator's recommendation, and if both of them accept the agreement document drawn by the mediator, it shall be final. Like agreement, conciliation may be a freely, flexible, nonpublic and interest grounded process.

  • There isn't any claimant or plaintiff in conciliation proceedings, any party can commence and discontinue the proceedings

  • The conciliator has the discretion to borrow any procedural law to make sure speedy and cheap conduct of proceedings and disagreement are settled by collective agreement and not by assessed opinions

  • As per section 80 of the act, the conciliation does not decide for the parties, but strives to support them in generating options so on gain a result that is compatible for both them.

  • The choice of the arbitrator is binding;still a mediator has no right to apply his opinions.


Meaning of Mediation

In ADR an unprejudiced person named as “mediator” helps both the parties to attain a mutually respectable resolution of the dispute. Mediator helps the parties to speak and break the disagreement themselves but does not make the selection of the case. Mediator help both the parties to produce them understand and to reach on a call with the concurrence of the parties. Mediator is not authorized to pass the award. This process helps the court to skip the unnecessary waste of your time during the court proceeding. Parties can be ordered by the court for mediation during the pendency of the case. Mediator is an alternate dispute resolution where a third party aims to help two or further debaters in reaching agreement.


Role of Judiciary in Alternate Disagreement Resolution

The original step within the aesthetics of ADR mechanisms in India was way back in 1940 when the law passed the primary Arbitration Act but thanks to its inadequacy and loopholes, it absolutely was noway completely enforced. Sometimes latterly in 1996, The Arbitration and Conciliation Act was passed with the agreement of the parties, to use agreement, conciliation , or other procedures at any time during the arbitration proceedings to encourage agreement. Further, Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, which has its base on the recommendations made by the Law Commission of India and Malimath Committee made it obligatory for the Court to relate the disagreement after issues are framed for agreement with the concurrence of the parties by any ADR medium.


To accommodate the pendency of cases within the courts of India, ADR plays an horizon less part in India by its different ways. Alternate dispute Resolution provides scientifically developed ways to the Indian bar which helps in reducing the burden on the courts. ADR provides colorful modes of agreement including, arbitration, conciliation, agreement, and Lok Adalat. Then, conciliation means tone- comforting between the parties to resolve their disagreement but it doesn’t have any statutory recognition in India. during a veritably developing nation like India with major profitable reforms afoot within the frame of the rule of law, tactics for dizzy resolution of controversies for lessening the burden on the courts, and to allow means for ready resolution of controversies, ADR is stylish for establishing installations for giving agreement of controversies through arbitration, conciliation , agreement, and conciliation . Therefore, there is an immense need for ADR in India.


International chamber of commerce (ICC)

  • On March 1st 2017, the ICC Rules of arbitration is employed each around the world to resolve controversies. They define and regulate the operation of cases submitted to the international court of arbitration.

  • “International commercial arbitration” is defined as an arbitration where a minimum of 1 among the parties is also a public or habitual occupant in any country other than India or a body commercial which is incorporated in any country away from India, or an association or association of anon-public

  • To start out an ICC Arbitration, Parties must submit a “Request for Arbitration” with the Secretariat of the ICC International Court of Arbitration at any of the services specified – PARIS, HONG KONG, NORTH AMERICA, BRAZIL, SINGAPORE, ABU DHABI. After admitting damage of a “Request,” the Secretariat will notify the replier party or Parties.

  • Each Request submitted by the party for appointment or inception of transnational arbitral proceedings, Anon-refundable form figure ofUS$ 5000will be charged.

  • The number of judges shall be three, unless the parties to a specific disagreement latterly agree in writing that a sole arbitrator shall be appointed to resolve similar particular disagreement. The judges shall be appointed simply in agreement with the ICC Rules and Agreement.

  • Judges may appointed by the Court either directly or upon the offer of an ICC National Committee; upon nomination by claimant (s), Respondent (s), the parties or theco-arbitrators; or by an appointing authority.

  • In international arbitration, the place of arbitration shall be fixed by the court unless agreed by the parties, an arbitral bench may after consulting with the party conduct at a position it considered applicable.


Conclusion

Alternate dispute Resolution (ADR) is also great for getting justice. It's because Alternate dispute Resolution is straightforward to resolve because the value is extremely cheaper, briskly, moxie, availability, gives conciliation between parties, lower formality involved and smaller inimical. In Alternate dispute Resolution each conflict that happens will get resolved with good way. Both parties should ask if the person will frequently be a counsel or other expert. Besides that, the parties also must accommodate this judgment. Alternate dispute Resolution can resolve controversies outside the court. Each decision given by the judge will not beget hostility to the parties.


Endnote

https://www.mondaq.com/india/trials-appeals-compensation/880718/10-landmark-judgments-on-arbitration-by-supreme-court-of-india-in-the-year-2019

https://www.dispute-resolution-hamburg.com/information/conciliation

https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-2810-conciliation-in-india.html#google_vignette

https://www.google.com/amp/s/blog.ipleaders.in/arbitration-conciliation-and-mediation/%3famp=1

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/52626671/

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/116972057/

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/88403840/

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/129057189/


bottom of page